Judith Allen

Principal shooting on The Pirates! has finished. The cut is (mostly) locked. Many of the sets have been dismantled, shooting crew have left, and we can still get parking spaces if we arrive slightly late. We even have Shaun The Sheep setting up where the Pirates sets used to be.

 Access: DENIED

We had a spectacular wrap party last weekend at Bristol's Mshed, where everyone dressed up as Pirates, Scientists, and some of the lesser-known (and potentially spoiler-y) characters.

We have 4 more weeks of work before final delivery. That's two before Christmas, and two after - in which all versions are finalised, confirmed with edit (who'll be finishing in London by that point), and delivered. It's getting quite close - after 5 years in the making.

However, it's proving quite difficult to get the company to get out of the mindset that now that filming's finished the film is over. Yesterday (Friday) afternoon and this weekend, half the phones aren't working while they "upgrade" the system. We've had whole days of not being able to access the viewing theatre. And we're not a small department - we've easily over 100 people. Plus there are outsourced shots to be approved. And still some final bits of sequence which aren't even locked yet.

So, please - everyone.

It's not over when the fat/ thin lady sings at the Wrap Party.

Some of us are still going, and really hoping to not have to work over Christmas - with or without added disruptions! Spare a thought for your post people this Christmas. We're still working really hard to make everyone look good.

Just about anyone who's used Avid before will know that all support queries and error message searches lead back to the Avid Community forum.

This is sometimes all you need to be able to fix your problem (even if the answer usually involves hours of work attempting to find a single corrupted audio file). More often, however, this occurs:

from xkcd

For those of you unfamiliar with xkcd (why? how?!) a great feature is the image alt text, accessible by hovering over the image on their website - or via an app on iOS. And it was the alt text which really made me think of the Avid Community:

"All long help threads should have a sticky globally-editable post at the top saying 'DEAR PEOPLE FROM THE FUTURE: Here's what we've figured out so far ...'"

Beautiful advice, and also potentially circumnavigating the existing dilema of whether to dredge up a 3 year old thread, start a new thread even though nobody knew the answer last time, or just try to get on with it yourself since nobody knew last time - and if they did figure it out then they're not the sort of person to update the old thread in which nobody else seems to have had the same problem over the last 3 years.

Here's a sample day to show what I presently do at Aardman as the editor in the VFX department on Pirates. My job has evolved a lot since I first started and basically loaded and exported shots, and after 6 months I gained an assistant of my own - which helped a great deal.

Of course, there's no such thing as a typical day in a job like this. Some days are packed full to bursting, others more relaxed. On some days nothing breaks, on others.... well, yes. It changes around a lot. And of course it's all much less segregated than this.

0830 - arrive at work. Switch computers on, and head to the canteen with my cafetiere mug for the first hit of the day.

0835 - load floor plates from the previous day onto the Baselight in the Black Hole. The Black Hole is our windowless room with all surfaces painted black. Some say that all sense of time and space can disappear in there. Our VFX supervisor lives there, and checks outputs from the VFX department for technical issues and flaws - and briefs the artists or supervisors on the necessary changes.

0900 - sit down at my desk, check emails for any urgent tasks and requests, flag the non-urgent ones to follow up later. I use post-its for my To Do list, as they can be easily re-organised as the day progresses and priorities change. As a non-linear editor, it's the only way that really makes sense.

0930 - my assistant arrives, as do other non-floor personnel. The working day begins. My assistant begins negotiations with the floor to make sure that VFX get our 10am time in the viewing theatre for our shot approvals. I update some spreadsheets on the network to reflect the shots which I loaded into the Baselight earlier, with any notes which came through from the floor at the time they were published about take choices (sometimes they film options to decide on at a later date, sometimes two versions are needed for international purposes, action can be split across several plates on greenscreen - there are many possibilities).

1015 - shot approval session in the Viewing Theatre. I used to run this, now my assistant takes care of it owing to the haggling required to get the time and the setup logistical requirements. Our VFX supervisor views the shots which have been submitted for approval, and gives notes on the shots which need further work or fixing. Two 2D passes are made for each stereoscopic eye, and then they are all viewed in stereo to check for issues.

1030 - receive a previz timeline from edit department from yesterday's director review session. This needs to be compared to the previous timeline which we sent to them so that we can tell what the changes are and which slates need to be re-worked to account for timing changes - or where a previous version of a slate has been used instead of the most recent. After conforming, several of the old track layers are added to a copy of the new timeline, to give us easy access to the versions during director reviews. If a slate has been reframed or retimed then it needs to be exported and published (via a linux script) for the artist to use in Maya so that they can match the new version.

1050 - enquiry from VFX coordinator about an edit change previously notified. I check it against the cutting copy timeline and verify/ expand on the note.

1100 - the previz artist is briefed by the VFX Producer on which changes need to be worked up as a result of the editorial director review session. My notes are added to these notes, and the artist who is working on that section of the sequence goes away to make their amendments.

1130 - import shots recently exported by previz/ anim, and place on the timeline. Our VFX anim timelines are for sequences which have been already approved in previz, and are kept separate. If the change is minor or technical in nature, the previous version is pasted over. If there are major changes in positioning, camera angle, or other elements then the new version is added on a higher track. Sometimes alternative (alt) versions are output - either at a director request or because it's something that the artist wanted to try out, so yet another video track (or more) is added for the alts in a sequence.

1230 - pop through to the edit department for a quick catch-up/ chat/ situation report on how they're doing with our requests and vice versa. Email the relevant people in VFX to make sure they are aware of current or forthcoming changes discussed.

1245 - lunch. We have a canteen in the building for the crew to use (at staggered intervals, since there are quite a lot of us now), there are options in the Aztec West business park where we're based, people bring food from home, and there's the option of heading out further afield to the nearby shopping centre to get some chores done at the same time.

1345 - load some more previz/ anim shots into my timelines for the review

1400 - director review. We'll go through a sequence (or part of one) and discuss the things which aren't quite working and how to fix them. Often we'll look at previous versions to see if the suggested change has already been worked up (and possibly rejected because of the surrounding slates at the time), and if not then I'll do some quick tweaking in the Avid to reframe or retime the slate to give everyone an idea of what it may look like when worked up. In certain circumstances the floor will want to shoot a certain shot before the previz is approved, so we'll bung in that shot for the directors and/or HoDs where applicable to view and make any last minute changes in context with the surrounding shots, and then send it off for techviz to translate the Maya scene into technical information for the floor to use and programme into their MoCo rigs to shoot.

1500 - tea break. An absolutely vital part of the day. We have some rather nice cakes available in the canteen from time to time.

1515 - sorting through the emails which have accumulated during the review and responding to them/ relaying information. Most of it tends to be VFX or anim asking for information about the floor plates or current edit, or edit passing on changes which may affect VFX - every shot in the film has VFX, but certain types of shots (e.g. those containing VFX-generated fluids) will be affected more by the types of changes that edit can make than others. I add all of these requests to a list on the network, and make a note of the EDL and reference versions output.

1530 - checking through the recent VFX outputs for shots which should be sent to edit as work-in-progress. There are various stages at which edit are interested in receiving updated versions from VFX for reasons of workflow or aesthetic, and of course once a shot's approved. I cross-reference the cutting copy and a still frame of the latest output to see if the update is worth sending across, and compile a list for my assistant to deal with. There are also several shots which I'll import into my own Avid project - if I need to check that an output's corrected a change requested by edit, or if it's a rendered update of a shot which anim are still working on, which may be requested for reference during an anim review. If the correction looks good, I'll tick it off my edit request list.

1615 - a request for further information from one of the VFX houses we're outsourcing some of our work to. Often this requires cross-referencing cutting copies, notes, EDLs, and several other sources of information to be sure that the answer is as thorough as necessary. It took a while to get used to the linguistic differences between VFX and edity people, and even longer to get precise terms across the boundary - and communicating some requests or requirements without being able to point at a screen and draw squiggly lines underneath certain numbers which link to other squiggly lines... but it's something of a necessity when they're based in other cities.

1645 - a director or HoD comes in to sit with a previz artist and work up a difficult shot. This often requires reference to floor shots and other versions of previz - sometimes a shot from an entirely different sequence can be loaded to help visualise the characters on the real set rather than the previz sets. Our previz sets and characters are significantly more detailed than you may expect, but there can be some discrepancies when dealing with the beautifully intricate Aardman sets which can affect a read on distances and timing.

1730 - gather the last previz outputs for anything which is going to edit. On a duplicated timeline I then condense all of the previz tracks that we keep for options onto one track to make it easier for the editor to use. I drag the sequence into our !!FROM PREVIZ bin which will be picked up by edit across the Unity.

1800 - collect info on what's been shot over the day to load into the Baselight first thing the following morning. Check for any emails which haven't been dealt with or forwarded on to someone better placed to respond. Tidy the Avid bins up a bit.

1830 - end of day. Unless there's a nearby deadline or too many shots have come through or there's an ongoing crisis... you get the idea.

Genuinely though, we do usually leave at a reasonable hour. Part of that seems to be the Aardman way - it's out of London, and there are a lot of employees who have young families who they want to get back to. Plus, the floor stop shooting at 6 and we do like to keep things fair....

I'd love to see others in the post community do posts of this nature and help us all get an insight into the type of work everyone's currently in... but this has also been a good exercise in writing down some of my main tasks to help explain what I've been doing when I'm next looking for work.

Late to the party as ever, I have only just discovered the Editing Association Video Series on AOTG.

I was browsing for EditFest videos from by backlogged RSS feed, and found the jackpot. ACE, CCE, ASE, and MEW videos all on the same page. Wondrous.

Click the image below to go directly to the page.

AOTG: Editing Association Video Series

PARENTS
So, have you started looking for work after Aardman yet?

ME
I've thought about it

PARENTS
Well you can't have long left now

ME
My contract ends in mid-January

PARENTS
That's coming up

ME
It's five and a half months away. Unless I find another job on an animated feature film, most jobs I want won't even last five and a half months.

PARENTS
Oh.

I guess when your parents have changed jobs perhaps about 10-15 times between them over two working careers, this media freelance lark is a difficult concept. 

It's becoming more difficult these days to find people who have had the same job their whole lives since leaving formal education, but tv/ film freelancers go some way beyond that. Has anyone tried recently to fill in a "previous work" section on an application form (e.g. voluntary work)? That can become a lengthy process. Same when it comes to previous addreses - I've moved for my current job, I'd probably move again (after what I'm assuming will be a move back to London in early 2012), I'd like to work in other countries... and people who haven't had close experience of this sort of lifestyle just don't understand.

Other times, people can't move around, on account of family commitments. A editor friend of mine has just gone to China for a month leaving his wife and two young daughters at home, for an offer too good to refuse when compared to the relatively slim pickings he has at home. It's a short contract, good pay, and something which won't happen too often - but he has to choose which jobs he takes and which jobs he can't. Sometimes jobs can't be refused, sometimes they have to be to the detriment of career, and usually there's some form of sacrifice involved in waving goodbye to friends and family, having no job security, not making plans for social events too far in the future...

But then there are the exciting challenges of making things work in different settings. Constant learning opportunities. A steady supply of new people to work with. Cultural shifts and inputs to enrich your life.  New experiences. Different content every day. Year on year technological advancements. Final products to show for all of those days (and nights) of work.

Job satisfaction.

Agent Kay

Oh yeah, it's worth it. If you're strong enough

- Men in Black, 1997

The first teaser trailers are out for Pirates!

The first is the UK version, with the "In an Adventure with Scientists" tag. Based on a good old sea shanty, this is the one that most of us (in a rather informal poll around the table at lunch) prefer:

And then there's the international version, tagged "Band of Misfits". The more cynical among us wonder if the mention of science in a movie title could put some people off. Probably. Still, it's of a different tone to the first. And less claymation-Aardman, in a sense. Which would be fair - the techniques employed in the film are significantly more technologically advanced than anything they've done in a feature film before - see Wired's "How Aardman is embracing the digital age" article for further musings.

Still, public reaction so far seems to have been good, our director and producer are off out in Cancun and LA doing the initial promotional circuit, and I'm looking forward to the world finding out more about the film.

I find myself in an interesting situation.

I am currently looking at a documentary project which has been started on by another editor, with a view to give feedback and possibly take some days to work on it myself. The work done so far has been in Final Cut Pro 7.

My current FCP system is 6 (Studio 2). I have had no real need until now to upgrade to Studio 3/ FCP7. Firstly I couldn't afford it, and then I was in a long-term contract (well, 1 2/3 years counts as long term in this business) elsewhere - by which point they brought out a new "update".

I assumed that when word of this "update" was released, that I would be able to skip a generation - yes, I'd miss out on the updates to Motion, Color, DVD Studio Pro, etc - but I am, at heart, an editor - and I usually rely on my friends who possess other skill sets to do the finishing work of grades and mixes. Skipping the generation is usually possible in Apple software - and if not, then they provide an upgrade path.

Then Final Cut Pro X was released. It did not support FCP 7 projects. But, worse than that, Apple took the step of removing all trace of the earlier versions from their stores. They also asked their resellers to return all copies.

So - what's a person in my situation to do? I asked Apple.

Yes, that's an Xtranormal "if you can type, you can make movies..." video. I know, I'm going to hell.

For those of you who don't want to sit through it, here is the summary (with some additional points):

• There is no technical solution to this problem (I should mention at this point that I am aware of the XML interchange workaround - I've used it before, and I know from that that it doesn't handle things like captions very well and is therefore unsuitable for use in this situation)
• Nobody I spoke to (I also phoned business/ professional sales before speaking to Pro Apps support at Apple "Care) knows what has happened to all of the recalled boxes.
• The official line is to use the apple.com/feedback link (please note that in the version dropdown box for "Which version of Final Cut Pro are you using?", the only option is 10.0) and hope that enough people do so in order for a solution to be worked on.
• That's http://www.apple.com/feedback/finalcutpro.html - fudge it in whatever way you can, I guess.
  
• If you want a copy of Final Cut Studio 3, then the Apple representatives I spoke to recommend using Amazon Marketplace. Despite the recall.
• I mentioned to both people I spoke to that I currently have 3 orders with different retailers for an upgrade box - and that none of them seem to be able to source any stock to send me. They seemed surprised and unaware that it had run out this quickly.

Apple, this has moved past a joke. It's now a tragedy.

People won't forget within two weeks that you once had an editing programme which worked, even if you do pull it off the shelves and remove mention of it from your site. They may within two months or two years. And even if this brand new direction does take off eventually, they'll remember the hassle of this period - and not want to risk ending up in the same situation.

I still have those three orders. Most have accepted the payment as their site showed the item to be in stock at time of order (or the site did not show anything) rendering , I cannot afford to spend upwards of what's now £300 on another potential wild goose chase before I get refunds when they admit they can't find it - and if they can, I need it. At least I need SOMETHING that can read Final Cut Pro projects. Which apparently isn't Final Cut Pro X.

It's a defining characteristic of stop motion animation that it takes a long time to make.

I've been on Pirates! for over a year now, in previs and VFX. They've been shooting for slightly longer than that, and are due to wrap in November. The processes generally associated with 'post' have been going on for even longer than that with animatics, dialogue records, and test work-ups to get the look right.

So you'd think that with an 18 month shoot, up to 12 times the length of a 'traditional' feature shoot, that keeping track of everything in post would be easy, right? 

Wrong.

Firstly, every single shot in the film has some form of VFX work. So that's over 1000. There are often foreground plates and background plates - some of which require re-syncing in edit.

There are rig-removals, greenscreen work, and entire environments to create in situations where it is impossible or impractical to animate on the floor. The big one in a pirate movie is obviously the water. There are several options to be chosen from creatively - some form of physical element which is animated along with the character/ ship/ sail/ other movements, which may not look realistic but allows for interaction on set; seperate plates for water which may not allow for interaction with the elements, although the interactive parts could be added in VFX with the bulk of the water; or total VFX creation which is potentially infinitely (until the film needs to be released!) tweakable.

Another major consideration is the shooting schedule. A lot of features are shot within a few weeks or months, especially those which are 90 minutes or less. Our 18 month shoot needs every day of shooting, and an incredible amount of coordination by our amazing production manager. We have different sets set up on over 40 units at the last count, several sets span multiple scenes from various stages of the film.... but also the relevant puppets need to be allocated to each set. There are more of certain major characters (also allowing for costume changes where relevant), but there's still not a lot of wriggle room. The impact of this is that sometimes shots get unexpectedly bumped up the schedule, some plates can get shot months later than the plates they go with, and sometimes script or edit changes happen which require re-shoots and the un-approval of previously approved takes.

The major plus side on Pirates! for the points above is that VFX is based in the same building that the movie is actually being shot in, and we can pop along to see people and live sets when necessary - or communicate changes and changed urgencies via the walkie channels. We can request clean plates (without the models), tracking passes (with markers at specific places), chrome ball photos (for lighting ref), and clarify technical requests or potential difficulties which may require a reshoot - all within about 30 minutes of the shot being finished - before they strike the set.

It's an amazing experience to be a part of, and being effectively "on set" is something which a lot of editing and/or VFX people may not often get the chance to be a part of. Aardman has now run its friends and family tours of some of the sets - which was a great experience for my parents who have supported me throughout film school and subsequent employment gaps.

It's also a great chance to work with some brilliant people. Our previz and VFX crews have worked on some fantastic projects in the past, and the editing team vary in experience from those who've worked on previous Aardman productions to those with a primarily dramatic experience base. Our workflow is constantly in flux as we encounter new requirements and difficulties, and the documentation and communication also changes over time as we find better ways to do things.

In this way, it's a totally ideal first feature for me to be working on. We have the time to make things better, and for me to suggest things as I see them. We have constant communication with the floor and the lovely directors who are on-site and split their time between pre-production (now largely over), production, and post - which allows for an appreciation of the challenges that they all face (again, often something not encountered in a post-production environment except by way of anecdote). AND I think we're going to get a rather good film out of it.

For more information on Pirates!, please see the official press release.

When I was younger, after going to the cinema I would almost mentally inhabit the world I had been temporarily involved in - allthemoreso with the superhero and children's fantasy films. Not for long, just a continuation past the actual two or so hours I had been sitting in the film. When I grew a little older and the trait faded out of memory, it was easy to attribute it to multiple factors associated with getting older: watching a wider genre of films, loss of the constant imagination process that kids fill their minds with before they have to learn and retain things like French and algebra....

I bring this up because it's the same part of my brain which I identify as being in overdrive after watching Black Swan, edited by Andrew Weisblum. The film was so carefully crafted around the emotions and perspectives of Natalie Portman's character Nina, that I not only felt the triumphs and paranoia whilst watching the film - I became hyper-aware of my own movements and those around me for the first few minutes afterwards.

To me, conveying the appropriate emotions whilst skillfully telling the story is what a good edit is all about. It can't extend in the same way to all genres, the appropriate footage and story must exist in the first place.... but the editor is the one who puts it all together and creates the magic that the audience are able to take away with them.

In Black Swan, there were certain physical moments for the audience to cringe at to encourage empathy; and the fact that the storyline stayed with Nina and her experiences as she saw them for the entire film was almost certainly another helpful element in guiding the audience along in her story. But shaping the individual elements and telling the overall story was really done masterfully - or at the very least exactly to my own individual tastes.


Oh, and cinemas? Please stop raising the lights the second the first credit is on screen. I really wanted to absorb the ending for a few more seconds there.

3D Conversion for Dummies

This is an actual switch at Aardman Aztec West. I like to show the picture to people who ask in passing how 3D works. Saves time.