… at least that’s what the certificate says. If you remove certain words.

My time at the NFTS culminated in 3 days of graduation screenings at the British Film Institute on the South Bank in London. Wednesday and Thursday were industry days – where various members of the film and television industry were invited to see the graduation films and some other selected films from the two year course, and then we could discuss them over drinks afterwards.

Of course, this also means that we got to see each other’s films for the first times in many cases – when the films were shorter in the first year with more regular deadlines, we used to all attend reviews and screenings to give feedback and see what everyone else was doing with their brief. But in the second year we all got a bit too busy and had our own films to be concentrating on, and the tradition lapsed – but it was great to see how they’d all turned out after hearing varying amounts during the filming and editing processes.

In addition to the four graduation films, I had two other films which I’d edited in my first year (a fiction – Brixton 85, and a documentary – Davey’s Last Order) screened at the industry days, which gave me a new audience reaction to notice and a chance to evaluate the editing decisions I’d made over a year ago… which was both illuminating and painful in certain respects, as self-examination tends to be!

The graduation films themselves all went extremely well – the animation Cherry on the Cake had laughs and ‘aww’s in all the right places and looked fantastic on a huge screen. The Love Bureau went down extremely well with the right humour – and perhaps in retrospect an overabundance of cats… although it was fairly representative of the rushes! Park Close again went down very well in front of a new audience, although I was double-booked with the screening of  TV or not TV which was unfortunate as the cast and writers were also in attendance and I thought it would be more useful to get the fresh audience reaction there.

Friday was the friends and family day and the actual graduation itself – which may have been more nerve-racking in many respects! Although in true NFTS tradition it was all rather informal… we corrected Nik‘s (the director of the school) speech en masse, got called scruffy by Michael Kuhn, had official photos taken with the stage party, and given sparkly certificates.

So on with the search for further employment! Whilst waiting for the less official ‘wrap’ party…

This was probably the last big screening or session that I’ll have attended during my time at the NFTS. But over the last two years, there have been quite a few people who’ve come to the school to share their personal wisdom and experience – and I do view myself as very fortunate to have had the opportunity to encounter so many fantastic people from the global film industry. I’ll try to list the ones who really stick out in my mind here – although most assuredly I’ll forget someone major.
Brian Tufano. It’s easy for me to forget about Brian, since he’s around the cinematography department so much. Idolized by the cinematography students, and justifiably so from the work experience, tutoring and inspiration he gives them.

Walter Murch. Came into school for one day only, complete with handouts and powerpoint presentations to illustrate case studies – in which we saw the view of his edit suite inside and out and his favourite mixing jumper (amongst other things). Just as insistent on the “you should stand up to edit” principle as you’d expect, and gave a really useful insight into sound at the same time illustrated by some truly classic sequences from the films he’s edited.

David Yates. Was deep in the Order of the Phoenix post at the time, but was very happy to talk at length about his previous projects and the importance of TV work. State of Play is an obvious example of this – it’s a fantastic drama, which everyone should see before the Kevin Macdonald film version comes out. He’s an alumnus of the NFTS’s directing course. Absolutely wonderful man, lovely to be around and totally unassuming.  Post-production trivia point – he insisted on taking his usual editor and composer with him if he was going to agree to direct Harry Potter. WB agreed.

Roger Deakins. Another fantastic bloke, another NFTS alumnus. Not suggesting any correlation, but you know….. He had all the time in the world for any questions from anyone, spent another day exclusively with the cinematography students (who temporarily found a new idol). He remembers details and answers questions on every shoot he’s ever done, talked through scenes from Jarhead, Jesse James… and was just incredibly giving with his time and thought processes. The forum on his website deakinsonline.com gives some insight into the type of answer a typical cinematography question would get.

Darren Aronofsky. Came in the day before we could see The Wrestler in our weekly preview screenings, which he seemed genuinely disapponted about and requested that feedback be sent on to him once we’d seen it. Which was actually pretty mindblowing for a generation of film school students who almost universally hold Requiem for a Dream to the highest possible regard. He opened the session with the fact that he’d applied to the NFTS but hadn’t gotten in – quite the ice breaker! Happy to talk on all subjects even those which seemed slightly uncomfortable – such as recasting and associated budget cuts.
Other inspirational names from my time at the film school – whether it was a short tutorial or full exercise/ short film editing supervision:

Stephen Frears – tutored throughout the first year film project alongside Sean Barton during the editing stage.
Alex Mackie – first year external examiner and tutor on our Richard III exercise. Very open, and has been a great help to me.
Barry Vince – came in very early in our film school careers to provide a structured and solid background in editing processes from which to work.
Roger Crittenden –  quite literally wrote the book on editing (or a book, at any rate), and tutored on several fiction films in my second year.
Mamoun Hassan – we spent a day with Mamoun just analysing the opening few minutes of The Man in the White Suit and learnt more about filmmaking than we ever thought possible.

I suppose one of the benefits of a postgraduate degree is being able to appreciate things like this all the more fully – and whilst you still have access to them. But the next stage is to get out there and start making names for ourselves in some form. Onwards and upwards, as they say….

As part of the film school process, we constantly have reviews of the film as we’re working on the edit so that the tutors can advise when something doesn’t seem to be working out, ask the right sorts of questions about how necessary certain scenes are or the ordering of the ones we have…. etc etc. But at the start it was difficult to get used to it (despite having been part of the selection process for admittance to the school – 11 people took a 5 day course at the school for the 6 places). Screenings, no matter how late in the edit, were inevitably accompanied by some form of disclaimer on how there hadn’t been time to do one bit, how it wasn’t yet close to what we were actually going for because we hadn’t had time to physically and/ or technically achieve that, or how it wasn’t quite along the right lines corresponding to the director’s vision once we started learning to work with directors and needed our own time to find the film….

But for the most part we’ve learnt to get past that now. Whether it’s the self-confidence that we know that it’s not the final edit and will hopefully be able to persuade anyone who asks of that fact now that we’ve had a bit of experience, or that we’ve grown used to the process, or just that it’s too valuable whilst at Film School to not get every ounce of opinion that you can on your film (even if the suggestions profferred aren’t ultimately taken up and a different solution is tried), it’s something that I hadn’t really noticed until working with the composer on the short I’ve been cutting for the last 3 weeks. Until now they’ve been used to working primarily with picture locks, but we really wanted to see how much some original music could set the tone and move the film on a bit so we brought it in fairly early in the edit. And all of the old discussions about screening rough cuts came back to me. Back when we used to work on the same rushes for exercises, and had screenings every few days so that we could see what everyone else was doing with the same material. And funnily enough, though we may have ‘borrowed’ ideas from another cut we still never ended up with even two films vaguely alike. Seeing the different stories you could tell by choosing different shots at different moments was possibly one of the most pivotal moments of my first term at Film School, and if I’d been hiding behind my seat from the shame of having to show my unfinished work to other people I think I’d have missed a lot. And I suppose that that would always hold true whilst you still consider yourself to be learning a craft – i.e. for as long as you continue to do it.

What I guess I’ve really learnt out of the experience is how to make the most of the early days – to make a proper rough representation of how a film will be, with the majority appropriate shots in the right place. Early edits can be fairly demoralising when cuts don’t seem to flow or characters aren’t really coming alive. But finding the bits which aren’t working can really help on the way to getting a respectable cut, especially when you get that first onscreen insight into what makes your character tick. And if it’s all been a struggle and things still aren’t working, an outside perspective on the world you think you’ve been trying to create can really help to just plant a new idea in there. Just for now, I’m trying not to discount anything which may ultimately be of benefit to the film, and the comments made always help to remind me what I should be looking out for as an editor.