The past month or so has been devoted to the Fiction graduation film. It’s been a bit of a journey, and our final structure is borne of the knowledge that we’ve tried just about all reasonable alternatives in-keeping with the genre. We’re at the stage now where if someone suggests something different to the version they’re seeing, I can just grab it from another sequence and demonstrate why it was rejected.

However, the fact that we’ve arrived at something which bears a strong resemblence to the first cut (barring two scenes swapped and others shortened or deleted) may have been a product of not trimming the scenes down at an earlier stage, to work with their position at the time – which would have made it easier to isolate the reasons why certain themes weren’t working so well rather than leading us around a mad semi-fantasy world in which half of the virgin audience thought that our main character was mad (we’re aiming for rom-com)! Not that that didn’t have its value of course – we determined the precise value of the dream section and returned it to its original form, cutting out all recurrences or flashbacks – even those originally scripted.

But whilst I thought I was going in and trimming as much as I could whilst we were still moving scenes around – thereby saving time because of not having to massively adjust scenes when we’d changed the order of events, I can see now just how much it held us back. In one sense.

In the other sense, we’re still on track to picture lock on the original schedule – and we almost certainly wouldn’t have arrived at the same film with the same confidence had we not gone through the stages that we did.

A still from “Mr Perfect”

Production designer James makes some last minute adjustments

The second stage of editing on my NFTS graduation animation, in which the live action background rushes are assembled according to our original animatic, has been completed. The backgrounds from the first shoot were done a few weeks ago, and given to the animator as a low-res .mov so that she could start work on the line drawings and getting the early stages of the animation started. This finished sequence will now replace that half-finished version in the first layer of her after-effects timeline.

Handles have also been added to a duplicate sequence to be graded (to allow colouring and compositing to start) so that they’re available for any extensions to the head or tail of a shot, should they turn out to be necessary – even though we timed everything as near as possible during the animatic phase. The film was shot with this in mind, so overall the sequence with the handles that will be graded is almost twice as long as the animatic and final film, though it’s the same number of shots so it shouldn’t be a major additional burden on the grading – and notes will be made on the EDL on which frames (multiple of 10 for easy trimming purposes) at the start and end of a shot are the handle.

We’ll be exporting a full res (1920 x 1080) TARGA sequence from the online suite because the school edit suites only have Sony HVR-M15Es and we’re not linked to any of the higher-res decks, and once I’ve removed the handles I’ll be giving my animator a TARGA sequence (plus any additional frames as necessary)… so it seems to make sense. To us, and that’s possibly what counts the most. It’s all about the trial and error really – the way we’re going about it may not be the most efficient, but given the resources we have plus the need for the animator and editor to have immediate access to the graded handles once the grader’s left the job (he’s a former student of the school – grading a grad project at this point in the year is a tricky proposition) it’s what we’ve come up with.

Wednesday is our ‘final’ board meeting, by which point the storyboard should be completely sorted. The editors have only actually had the last 5 days to be working full time with the animators – it’s been a moment here and there stolen from another project before now. So essentially that’s 7 days to get the animatic sorted and sort out the angles, plot holes, ordering, trimming of redundancies…. theoretically all possible. Except every time you request a new angle or additional drawing to fill in either information in the current angle or a new one, the animator has to go and draw that, as well as scan it!

Once all of the frames from the original storyboard had been scanned and put in order, we basically started working in a system where I played around with timings and made a wish list of extra shots/ points to raise while Hye-Bin (my director) was working on some new frames. We meet up when she’s done with that. We quickly insert the frames in to where they were meant to be, I go through my new list with her, we discuss some of the plot points and/or pacing issues that are emerging from the present version, then I go and trim the frames we’d just inserted and look through it some more whilst she goes and draws the solutions we think of during our chat. And repeat.

It’s a process not without difficulties. The main point at the moment is making sure that an audience understands what’s going on – especially since there’s going to be very little intelligible dialogue even when the film’s been finished. For this film we should initally be aiming for an animatic completely without sound, any points which motivate action (e.g. a doorbell) should be drawn on to the frame at the appropriate point or added in FCP. Looking over the current film this weekend I’m considering suggesting the removal of a scene which I think isn’t adding much to the film – however nice it is and how much we’ve worked on it, it’s sometimes a decision you have to make. And the ending’s something that neither of us are yet completely satisfied with – but we’re sort of hoping for inspiration to strike!